I want to know how many people use "ReCache"

Leanna

I want to know how you feel about using "ReCache". I didn't subscribe to "ReCache" because I don't know if "ReCache" is good enough in all environments, and I am not interested in subscribing. I hope The way is to pay in one lump sum.

Now my forum is running slower and slower. It takes only 10 seconds to respond to a successful discussion. I really have enough.

jordanjay29

Leanna Now my forum is running slower and slower. It takes only 10 seconds to respond to a successful discussion. I really have enough.

What type of hosting are you using? VPS? Shared? What kind of space/memory does it provide?

It sounds like you might have performance issues unrelated to Flarum, unless you have a very large Flarum site. I don't see a showcase topic or any link you've posted about it to view for myself.

datitisev

Leanna I hope The way is to pay in one lump sum.

A subscription is required to install + update premium extensions. You will be able to use extensions that you have already installed, even if their subscription ends.

Leanna

jordanjay29
vCPUs: 2Cores Memory: 8 GiB Current Bandwidth: 5Mbps

I also enabled CDN for all static files.
My test station has more than 1 million member data and 100,000 discussion data.
My server configuration is not low, but I don't understand why send a post and click the send button to wait at least 10 seconds to jump

Leanna

datitisev I understand what you mean now, I will try to subscribe for a try.

[deleted]

Leanna I also enabled CDN for all static files.

Interested to know how you implemented this. Are you sure it's for all static files and not just fonts ?

[deleted]

Leanna Current Bandwidth: 5Mbps

That's very low. Mine is almost 1Gbps

Powermage

Leanna My test station has more than 1 million member data and 100,000 discussion data.

Are you running a real forum, or is this just a stress-simulated forum?

Also: Not every VPS is the same.
if they are really overbooked and the VPS needs to "fight" for CPU or other resources you can have a very slow forum (and server) while you think all should be fine.

matteocontrini

[deleted] if you pass the whole domain's traffic through CloudFlare or similar services (Incapsula, Stackpath) you'll get caching of static assets, while dynamic content will be passed to your server.

[deleted] I think that with "current bandwith" she actually meant current. And the connectivity for virtual servers is almost never dedicated anyway, it's best effort

luceos

[deleted] 1Gbps

That's really high end, the usual connection is 100Mbps for regular vps/shared hosting environments. Throttling it to less is often a precaution by the ISP to prevent spam runs taking place from that environment.

[deleted]

luceos I'm special... 👍

[deleted]

matteocontrini if you pass the whole domain's traffic through CloudFlare or similar services (Incapsula, Stackpath) you'll get caching of static assets, while dynamic content will be passed to your server.

I don't. I've stopped using cloudflare because their TTFB is far too high for my liking and their WAF is no longer of any value as my own VPS does this so no point in paying for it when I already have. The missing link at the moment is a distributed CDN.

matteocontrini

[deleted] I was just discussing how that can be achieved currently 🙂 I don't like CloudFlare either

[deleted]

matteocontrini flarum needs CDN functionality 👍👍