clarkwinkelmann

Ok, well that must not be the problem then. I don’t know why the YouTube url wouldn’t convert. After disabling this extension it converted to a video. Something’s not quite right.

    Rich Text is a greate feature but is conflict with others extensions that make me disappointed about these problems. I hope there a fix for make Blog and others compatible.

    One of my issue from Github: askvortsov1/flarum-rich-text4

    • ctml replied to this.
      9 days later

      Because @askvortsov is not available for any release right now, I forked this project and released some patches today.

      Installation

      composer require glowingblue/flarum-rich-text:v2.0.4-beta.1

      This is released under the glwowingblue namespace, as @glowingblue is sponsoring this update!

      Note 1:
      Once my changes / fixes will be merged in the official repository, the glowinglbue fork will be deleted.

      Note 2:
      The beta tag is only used here so that the official repository can later release a v2.0.4 without interfering with this fork.

        5 days later

        I just realized that this fork breaks translations and settings (and maybe other thing), because of the change of namespace... For that reason I will make another branch and tag another version that will use the original namespace.

        To use this other version (it'll be v2.0.3.1) you will need to add the glowinglue git repository to your composer configuration.

        wolfshards You can fix this with a little bit of css added to your style settings.

        .Flarum-Blog-Composer .ProseMirror.FormControl.Composer-flexible.TextEditor-editor.Post-body{
            min-height: 250px;
        }

        That help. Thx, now the editor needs to be adjusted to not getting windowed.

        • ctml replied to this.

          wolfshards what do you mean by that, do you mean a vertical scrollbar? Can you share a screenshot?

          Yes a vertical scrollbar and another bug about the editor is about that glitched the use of Rich text tools. Soo is hard to explain and the screenshots i can do.

          askvortsov except indented codeblocks

          Does this include indented lists? Or is there maybe some keyboard shortcut to use nested bullets in a list? Thanks!

          wolfshards

          If you want to hide the horizontal scroll bar you can apply some css as well. However that's probably happening because you have a smaller screen width. You could also optionally use some css to make the page wider, I think flarum by default has 1100px width for large screens - on my forum I increased that slightly to 1200px.

          .FlarumBlog-Article-Post .Post-body{
              overflow-x: hidden;
          }

          Larger width page

          @media (min-width: 1200px) {
              .container {
                  width:1200px !important;
              }
          }
          Merged 1 post from a problem while useing Rich Text plugin..

          Scrooge I have merged your post into the extension discussion since it appears to be a problem with a specific extension and not Flarum in general.

          Can you maybe share more details? Does it happen only when editing a post, or also when writing a new post or discussion?

            Scrooge I can't reproduce that. Does it occur on every post or only under certain conditions? Do you have any custom css that could be interfering?

              clarkwinkelmann
              both!turn the plugin ON, while I was writing or edit post against it happening .But when I close the plugin than problem solving .

              RgDhGj.png

              ctml
              I did not add any css code. humm, while I was written I can not do any thing with post, cannot scroll ,cannot copy(actually cannot copy post only)and while writing with markdown ,it did not show any markdown code.
              for example:

              • code:
                # markdown(code '#'showed )
              • show:

                markdown

                (without '#'code while editing post)
              12 days later

              I think discussion / reply templates are not currently enriched when they are loaded into the editor, so I believe the two are not compatible with one another (unless formatting is omitted from the templates, then it is BAU)