Flarum v1.3.0 Released

wbntff 'no self likes' is no longer working since flarum 1.2 update or php 8+

Please report any issue in the extension discussion or on the extension GitHub repo so the extension author is made aware of it. Not all extension authors use all their extension nor do they read every discussion on the forum. They can't fix an issue if nobody reports it to them

wbntff oh sorry, I did check the discussion for any bug report before writing my post but I didn't notice your post had both a suggestion and bug report in the same sentence

The lack of update for months is not indicative of anything wrong by itself. I personally have created many extensions that are so simple they will almost certainly not require any change until Flarum 2.0 gets released.

However while Nearata hid their public last login time my mod powers show they haven't been online in quite a long time

You could try reporting the issue on GitHub, where there's a higher chance they get an email notification.

Hello all ;D

Uhh .. my first update from my little forum with Flarum and no errors ... Thanks for you very awesome Support ;D

I guess GDPR compliance is still missing ...?

streaps An extension for it is on the roadmap

askvortsov An extension for it is on the roadmap

Make sure you don't use any dark patterns. IMO the dark-patterned GDPR cookie compliance banners are in no way GDPR compliant. Forums that do that will expose themselves to litigation both in Europe and potentially from Australia as well as the regulator here has stated they are specifically going after dark patterns which trick visitors into accepting choices that are not in their interests. Defined as: "The ACCC refers to dark patterns as elements of user interfaces which have been designed to make it difficult for users to express their actual preferences, or which nudge users to take certain action that may not be in their best interests." (Digital platform services inquiry - September 2021 interim report). A foreign company was fined $47 million for doing this with their appeal dismissed last month. Most people will only have read the headline, but look at the detail:

In January 2020, the Federal Court found that Trivago had breached the Australian Consumer Law by misleading consumers when representing that its website would quickly and easily help users identify the best deal or cheapest rates available for a given hotel.

In fact, Trivago used an algorithm which placed significant weight on which online hotel booking site paid Trivago the highest cost-per-click fee in determining which rates to highlight on its website and as a result often did not highlight the cheapest rates for consumers.

Trivago admitted that between December 2016 and September 2019 it received approximately $58 million in cost-per-click fees from clicks on offers that were not the cheapest available offer for a given hotel, causing consumers to overpay hotel booking sites approximately $38 million for rooms featured in those offers.

...

The following is an example of Trivago’s online price display taken on 1 April 2018. For example, the $299 deal is highlighted below, when a cheaper deal was available if a consumer clicked “More deals” (underneath the offers from other booking sites in the middle panel).

I expect they will definitely enforce the same standard against advertising choices etc. You'd almost have to be an idiot if you think otherwise. See the labelled screenshot to see what I mean - "the best deal" is there and is clearly visible, but because it's not highlighted and because they advertised that they would show consumers "the best deal" they were found to be deliberately misleading consumers, with the evidence being that most people didn't select the best deal very likely due to them highlighting a deal which wasn't the best one for the consumer.

mueenulit it’s 2.0.8

Updated, looks good!