Litalino This bounty hasn't been picked up yet - and it hasn't had enough funding yet either. If you want to see this happening you can upvote the proposal - and even better add your own pledge.

Oshvam added a bounty of 18.75.

I have done my bit to make this happen. Best of luck 💪

Teddan added a bounty of 11.25.
a month later

So the proposal here is to make an extension that combines the Flarum Achievements extension and the user badge extension?

Would it be smart to combine them tho? If someone wants only the badges, they'd get achievements too and it wouldn't get used + vice versa

Either way both systems should be independent from eachother i guess

Ngl, I feel called upon (+ also interested) to at least make the achievement extension compatible again, it's a great system

    MichaelBelgium what's the real difference between them besides the name of achievement and badge?

    I think with some slight changes to the badge extension (e.g. display badge in post footer) you could do everything with the badge extension + automoderator (this was discussed in the thread too) because you can then grant badges based on dynamic criteria which is pretty much what achievements are except that the criteria is a bit more static being embedded in the achievements extension whereas badge + automoderator is a lot more flexible imo.

      MichaelBelgium in some way, both extensions are similar. They both try to motivate users by rewarding them with achievements/badges. So their logic is/should be quite similar. As both are abandoned, taking a closer look at them might make sense so efforts are not wasted when writing a revival extension. As ctml said it was also discussed if it wouldn't make sense to offload the automation part to the AutoMod extension. @askvortsov plans to release an updated/more generic version of the extension as soon as he finds some time.

      An essential part for me is that the future revived extension is part of FoF as it's something that is essential to the ecosystem and was used by a lot of users. FoF would/will give it more stability.

        ctml GreXXL

        Yeah, upon further looking it seems they have the indeed the same purpose. Looked at both way too fast 😉

        GreXXL An important part for me is that the future revived extension is part of FoF as it's something that is essential to the ecosystem and was used by a lot of users. FoF would/will give it more stability.

        Either competent dev can it make more stable but yeah in a team there's more contribution i guess. So as i'm not part of FoF I can't really help - if thats a "hard" require for you

          MichaelBelgium Either competent dev can it make more stable but yeah in a team there's more contribution i guess. So as i'm not part of FoF I can't really help - if thats a "hard" require for you

          Maybe you could get in touch with @IanM (who has also voiced interest IanM ), if this is not something doable. FoF is always looking for new contributors. I think this is a more complex extension (even might have some requirements of other extensions) so having them work well together and all being maintained (also with upcoming 2.0) is something important. It's not a hard requirement though. It's a bounty about reviving this and maintaining it for a prolonged time - just with a strong preference that it happens in a collective like FoF.

          It would be a very useful and great job. Thank you.

          6 days later

          Would very much appreciate this revival!

          21 days later
          2 months later
          a month later
          a month later

          dragsugur none yet. The release of the new flarum.org website has taken away a lot of our time.

          Anyone else can still pick this up if they want, we will ping back here if we start working on it actively.