Recieved the "installation failed"? for Fof Upload extension. How can i install the Fof Upload extension? (for Beta 14.1)
FriendsOfFlarum upload, the intelligent file attachment extension
On upload watermark after select the image then upload the page is refresh and not save is it normal?
- Edited
luceos yes that command worked,
however, this is how it looks in the settings. (also no errors on the console section of the browser too)
HuseyinKogo solved it, i just disabled the extension and enabled back and it worked
Bucket settings for public access - What is the recommended settings for using s3 for uploads?
clarkwinkelmann thanks, but it doesn't specify any bucket settings for public access
0.12.0
- Flarum beta 15 compatibility
Using version 0.12.0 for fof/upload
./composer.json has been updated
Loading composer repositories with package information
Updating dependencies (including require-dev)
Your requirements could not be resolved to an installable set of packages.
Problem 1
- Installation request for fof/upload 0.12.0 -> satisfiable by fof/upload[0.12.0].
- fof/upload 0.12.0 requires flarum/core >=0.1.0-beta.15 <0.1.0-beta.17 -> no matching package found.
Potential causes:
- A typo in the package name
- The package is not available in a stable-enough version according to your minimum-stability setting
see https://getcomposer.org/doc/04-schema.md#minimum-stability for more details. - It's a private package and you forgot to add a custom repository to find it
Read https://getcomposer.org/doc/articles/troubleshooting.md for further common problems.
Installation failed, reverting ./composer.json to its original content.
for beta 13:
composer require fof/upload 0.10.*for beta 14:
composer require fof/upload 0.11.*luceos Thank you 
. Love you Forever
- Edited
FriendsOfFlarum
Hello
Is it possible to add support for Cloudreve
Testing this extension on my members only / private forum, but noticed all uploads are publicly available if you have the URL. Is there any way to limit accessing files/images/uploaded content to signed-in users only (or even better, ones that have permission to view the relevant threads)?
DJM0 if you use the "download" template, the real path on disk will never be revealed to the user, and access control is enforced.
If you use preview templates, then the real path on disk will be revealed and can be shared around.
There's no way to have access control per discussion. However if you can't see the post, you shouldn't be able to guess the file UID or path.
Hi! I'm getting this error on the console when using this extension on beta15.
I'm using 0.12
Thanks!
This one isn't ready for beta 15 yet, right?