Eldenroot but having seperate page for managing private chats Like this one would be great, even byobu is great though

      Anyway have two similar extensions is fine... because there is a way that one of them will be a premium extension in future, am I right? ?

        @Eldenroot Flagrow created their own twist on "private" discussions. What @Shahiem is trying to develop is no way similar to what flagrow/byobu provides as far as concept other than privacy. He is developing what is considered the "classic" forum approach to private messaging (PM's). This concept pars fairly with bulletin board software such as Vbulletin, XenForo, PHPbb, etc.

        I use Byobu for private on-board discussions and because it has it's own crazy twist that I like over the classic way (i.e. host meetings, off-chat discussions, private fanclubs, etc).

        What I will use @Shahiem's extension is to provide my community with "Private Messaging" through an inbox-styled interface.

        Private Discussion = / = Private Messaging System.

        @Ralkage even so they have a common ground and truth be told that's perfectly fine.

        We're not here to compete, we're here to offer the community kick ass extensions. @Shahiem is doing a great job from what I've seen and seems to enjoy himself. I'm also looking very much forward to this extension.

          Shahiem Is there going to be a github repo available soon so we can test it out?

            Shahiem Cool! I am going to test this out for sure! Maybe tweak it myself, and make a PR

              Frink composer require treefiction/privateMessage

              tried, no chance , is any special permission required? getting these

              [InvalidArgumentException]
              Could not find a matching version of package treefiction/privateMessage. Check the package spelling, your version c
              onstraint and that the package is available in a stability which matches your minimum-stability (beta).

              require [--dev] [--prefer-source] [--prefer-dist] [--no-progress] [--no-suggest] [--no-update] [--no-scripts] [--update-no-dev] [--update-with-dependencies] [--update-with-all-dependencies] [--ignore-platform-reqs] [--prefer-stable] [--prefer-lowest] [--sort-packages] [-o|--optimize-autoloader] [-a|--classmap-authoritative] [--apcu-autoloader] [--] [<packages>]...

                  jordanjay29 no, packages not posted to packagist will not work with composer require.

                  Strange. It said above when I looked at it that it was posted to packagist.... maybe you need to use the --dev tag?

                      Frink i did with manual installation, its working but currently have no functionality

                          a month later

                          Shahiem that´s amazing but remember to add some spam control in PM and a way for admins or moderators to control those annoying spammers!!!