FriendsOfFlarum Byōbu, well integrated, advanced private discussions

luceos

Walys But some questions

have any date to go with stable version? Maybe some days, weeks, months....

No. @IanM and I want to make sure everything works as intended before tagging a stable version. We haven't entirely resolved all performance issues.

have any future idea to implement this extension to flarum core @luceos ? Or go with other system in the future for private message? I am little scared about install this in my community and then flarum core go with other private system.

It is extremely unlikely the flarum core team will build another private messaging extension. I think that outlook/promise needs to be changed.

have the possibility in the admin panel a option to avoid the private message are listed in "all discussion" and only view when you go to private discussion tag?

There is no private discussion tag. And whether we will split private discussions, read

IanM It is by design that private messages that the logged in user has access to are included in all discussions. The nature of byobu is that it's simply a normal discussion that is private.

GreXXL

Never noticed. But in a private discussion the list of participating users are linked to "true" (eg. https://discuss.flarum.org/d/true) which is of course an invalid URL not known to Flarum. Here is an example below.

Silverteal

GreXXL YESS!
It only happens above the post, but not on main page and sidebar

ornanovitch

Do you encounter any problem with byobu & websocket? With the Kyrne's one, I got a js bug each time I publish a new discussion (byobu or not). Quoting myself from ornanovitch on the Websockets thread:

[...] On the front side, it works perfectly for posts into discussions. But there is a problem regarding the discussion list. Whenever I publish a new discussion, the index empties and I have this message into the console (and the ones who are connected too):
TypeError: e.recipientUsers().find is not a function
    Pt Discussion.js:98
    e extend.js:35
    e extend.js:33
    controls DiscussionControls.js:28
    controls DiscussionControls.js:27
    view DiscussionListItem.js:68
    a render.js:30
    l render.js:155
    l render.js:160
    l render.js:66
 [...]
    exports render.js:964
    a mount-redraw.js:14
    c mount-redraw.js:25
mount-redraw.js:15:23
    a mount-redraw.js:15
    c mount-redraw.js:25
recipientUsers... it seems to be directly related to byobu, but I have no problem with byobu otherwise.

FYI desactivating byobu resolves this problem.

juzi

Does it adapt to 1.0.4?

GreXXL

juzi it is compatible - but in beta. You need to run:
composer require fof/byobu:"*@beta"

luceos

sibidharan you can read all about it in my post luceos

edit:

sibidharan seeing that you now have spammed several issues and pull requests on the repository I am going to state this here as well:

This extension is provided as open source. Nothing forbids you from forking the extension and reintroducing the features you miss. Understand that the maintenance and support of such a fork will fall onto you as well. We - the maintainers of this extension - decided against maintaining some features in order for it to survive in at least some form.

Harassing maintainers here and on GitHub I cannot appreciate. We invest so much time just to keep extensions available to the wider public. Blaming us will get you nowhere.

sibidharan

luceos I do not intend to blame or harass you! I just got panic seeing a major feature I was relying on was broken. I already forked and started the development process. Thanks for replying.

xasharma

Which version should I install for Flarum 1.0.4 ?

luceos

xasharma

composer require fof/byobu:"*@beta"

xasharma

luceos

Thank you

xasharma

luceos

I am having a problem ... Its working but

Provokator86

xasharma maybe change http > https?

luceos

Can you check your storage/logs latest log file or enable debug to see a trace/error?

xasharma

storage/logs - https://hastebin.com/cahibewuco.less

luceos

xasharma

luceos

Debug logs - https://hastebin.com/adapehaxob.less

Walys

Some questions.

1- When any user open a Private Discuss with other. After the first message view this text:
"OP user" added recipients "user1" "OPuser"

If I click on "user1" go to user profile correct but if I link in "OPuser" this is mine (I open the Discussion) have an error and Flarum said me: "The requested resource was not found."

2- When the user reply the Private Discussion you view this in "all discussion" tag. Ok, but I view that this "private discussion" go down if have any other more new and recently discuss in the forum. I think this is a problem if any user have many Notifications, it´s possible that not view the Private discussion at first to reply fast.
Maybe possible "sticky" the private discussion when any reply in "all discussion" tags?
Or maybe tick in bold the tag text: Private Discussions?

Sorry, not explain well, my english is not soo good. 😆

xasharma

Provokator86 it is in localhost .... I have tried on HTTPS also

m4v3rick

Not sure if already mentioned:

If one user opens a private discussion with another one and both later leave this discussion, the discussion still exists but seems to lose the "private"-tag. It is then a discussion without any tag but suddenly visible to Admin and Supermod/Mod.

Any problem with my permission settings or intended?

Edit: it is a deleted private discussion without any tag.

luceos

m4v3rick is it visible to guests or other regular members?

m4v3rick

hrvoje_hr

m4v3rick If one user opens a private discussion with another one and both later leave this discussion, the discussion still exists but seems to lose the "private"-tag. It is then a discussion without any tag but suddenly visible to Admin and Supermod/Mod.

m4v3rick

luceos Nope, only to people with the right to delete a discussion - as far as I found out yet.
To remove the right "delete discussion forever" won't help.

« Previous Page Next Page »