FriendsOfFlarum Webhooks

AnteikuDevs

How do we get the webhook sent to discord to load the image or image that we post in the discussion content
https://discuss.flarum.org/d/17812-friendsofflarum-webhooks

IanM

1.1.1

fix: Unable to serialize Carbon instances FriendsOfFlarum/webhooks53

Note: this is a temporary fix, pending a PR to a 3rd party library used by this extension

Updating

composer require fof/webhooks:"*"

IanM

1.1.2 What's Changed

Use double quotes in translations by @rob006 in FriendsOfFlarum/webhooks56

hamedeshaghi

jslirola i have this problem, too and when i approve a discussion, no webhook is sent. any solution?

jslirola

hamedeshaghi I created an issue 6 months ago but didn't get any response:

FriendsOfFlarum/webhooks57

datitisev

1.2.0

Allow selecting multiple tags per webhook (FriendsOfFlarum/webhooks61)
- The tags selected act as an OR query -- if the discussion has any of them (not necessarily all), the webhook will be fired
- For non-parent primary tags, only select the child if you want the webhook to only fire on it. If you choose both the child & its parent, it will fire on discussions that only have the parent
- E.g. this webhook will be fired on discussions that have either the General tag, the approval tag, or both
1.1.5 Send webhooks when posts are approved
- For Guests, sends 'new post' or 'new discussion' webhook when post is approved.
- For Admins, sends 'new post' or 'new discussion' webhook when post/discussion is made, and 'post approved' webhook when it is approved

jslirola

datitisev 1.1.5 Send webhooks when posts are approved
For Guests, sends 'new post' or 'new discussion' webhook when post is approved.
For Admins, sends 'new post' or 'new discussion' webhook when post/discussion is made, and 'post approved' webhook when it is approved

Thanks David, updated and tested, everything works great 🙂

jmillerv

I was looking into getting private discussion webhooks working. Initially, I went to the FoF Byobu and looked into adding tags there but was informed that tags caused issues with permissions. Would it be possible for me to add private discussions to the webhooks? Good idea/bad idea? Would there be a good place for me to start doing this?

My friends and I use Flarum for a pbp and I set up the webhooks to notify people of posts. Works great for everything but our private discussions.

I had an alternative idea to get fancy with the tags/permissions to create private channels, but that's a bad admin experience.

Redoslaw

I have a problem of this kind, where instead of being able to select tags, I have something like this:

When I manually add any tag ID from the database, then the tag selection field appears as it should. What could be the issue?

datitisev

1.2.1

Fix not being able to select tags on webhooks with no tag restrictions set (Redoslaw)

Redoslaw

datitisev Now it works great! Awesome! Thank you so much for such a quick response! By the way, it's a fantastic plugin!

ImplicitDeny

Hi ! Currently experimenting with outgoing webhooks here, and encountering some problems. Here is my setup :

latest flarum with latest fof/webhooks, as a docker image, running locally with access to network
FoF/Webhooks enabled, with a "Slack" webhook for all tags, all events, toward a Huginn dev server my company is using
FoF/Webhooks debugging is enabled

~~Long and obsolete description of a problem that no longer exists~~

Nevermind, deleted the webhook, then re-added it the exact same way, URL and parameters, and it works. Magic I guess.

datitisev

ImplicitDeny Even though you fixed the issue, were there any relevant logs that could maybe help figure out the problem? Stuff like extra whitespace around the URL, etc... If not, no worries. Just in case the info can be helpful.

ImplicitDeny

No, I didn't succeed to identify any cause to that, any log/warning/error either in log files or on standard output, no blocked request on host, no discarded message on Huginn side. At this point I have zero clue of what happened, I simply copied the URL, deleted the webhook, re-created it and pasted the URL again.

If I had to take a guess, I would say that somehow, the initially created webhook was not saved/applied. I know it is supposed to autosave, but I can't see any element that can confirm that the webhook was indeed properly set.

I also spinned up a new container in order to try and replicate the problem : I remember messing around with the dropdown list a few times and also clicking multiple times on a few UI elements when trying to configure the webhook for the first time. However, I was not able to reproduce the problem. Not much I can give you here... If I encounter anything useful, I'll keep you updated !

datitisev

1.2.2

Fix error when migrating from old webhooks version (FriendsOfFlarum/webhooks65)

Amarok

Hello,
Have a new installation and when installation this extension have this fatal error :

`Deprecated: Opis\Closure\SerializableClosure implements the Serializable interface, which is deprecated. Implement __serialize() and __unserialize() instead (or in addition, if support for old PHP versions is necessary) in /home/clients/a2611ad6d45ef693a6414c44198fad46/sites/actusgaming.com/vendor/fof/webhooks/override/Opis/Closure/SerializableClosure.php on line 22

Fatal error: Uncaught Laminas\HttpHandlerRunner\Exception\EmitterException: Output has been emitted previously; cannot emit response in /home/clients/a2611ad6d45ef693a6414c44198fad46/sites/actusgaming.com/vendor/laminas/laminas-httphandlerrunner/src/Exception/EmitterException.php:20 Stack trace: #0 /home/clients/a2611ad6d45ef693a6414c44198fad46/sites/actusgaming.com/vendor/laminas/laminas-httphandlerrunner/src/Emitter/SapiEmitterTrait.php(42): Laminas\HttpHandlerRunner\Exception\EmitterException::forOutputSent() #1 /home/clients/a2611ad6d45ef693a6414c44198fad46/sites/actusgaming.com/vendor/laminas/laminas-httphandlerrunner/src/Emitter/SapiEmitter.php(21): Laminas\HttpHandlerRunner\Emitter\SapiEmitter->assertNoPreviousOutput() #2 /home/clients/a2611ad6d45ef693a6414c44198fad46/sites/actusgaming.com/vendor/laminas/laminas-httphandlerrunner/src/RequestHandlerRunner.php(75): Laminas\HttpHandlerRunner\Emitter\SapiEmitter->emit(Object(Laminas\Diactoros\Response\HtmlResponse)) #3 /home/clients/a2611ad6d45ef693a6414c44198fad46/sites/actusgaming.com/vendor/flarum/core/src/Http/Server.php(45): Laminas\HttpHandlerRunner\RequestHandlerRunner->run() #4 /home/clients/a2611ad6d45ef693a6414c44198fad46/sites/actusgaming.com/public/index.php(26): Flarum\Http\Server->listen() #5 {main} thrown in /home/clients/a2611ad6d45ef693a6414c44198fad46/sites/actusgaming.com/vendor/laminas/laminas-httphandlerrunner/src/Exception/EmitterException.php on line 20`

I have many other extensions but only fof/uploads is active (and basics Flarum extensions)

Install Infos

Flarum : 1.8.5
PHP : 8.3.3
MySQL : 10.6.15-MariaDB-1:10.6.15+maria_deb11-log
Pilote de file d'attente : sync
Pilote de session : file

When i tried using "php flarum info" have this strange message
Fatal error: Composer detected issues in your platform: Your Composer dependencies require a PHP version ">= 8.2.0". You are running 8.1.27. in /home/clients/a2611ad6d45ef693a6414c44198fad46/sites/actusgaming.com/vendor/composer/platform_check.php on line 24

clarkwinkelmann

Amarok this is expected behaviour. You need to disable PHP deprecation warning in your php.ini (or managed PHP panel)

For the second php flarum error you should make sure your default command line PHP version is the same as the one for the webserver (seems to be set to 8.1 instead of expected 8.3`)

Amarok

clarkwinkelmann Ok. Thx for you answer. Hosting support contacted and hop they do something. Have no access to change those things 🤞

adam42

Can this extension call any URL, like Zapier?

« Previous Page