Discussion about VPS and performance.

MartinJD

[deleted] That sounds quite expensive to be honest. My DO droplet is about 5$ per month.

[deleted]

MartinJD true, but that's for a shared CPU. Mine is dedicated.

matteocontrini

peopleinside Do you have shared CPU or Dedicated CPU?

What they call "default" on the website 🙂 we don't get to know how much it is shared unfortunately. Hetzner and DigitalOcean are however (in my experience) very good at balancing resources. The CX21 plan on their website is for the moment more than enough for my web server (some websites + Flarum + MySQL). The load is what comes from having 50-100 online users.

[deleted] A VPS is a guaranteed segment of physical hardware which is a thousand times better then any shared hosting as it's only you on it. A physical instance is altogether different in the sense that the entire machine is dedicated to you which is why is very expensive.

There's also an intermediate step which would be dedicated vCPUs. The hardware would be shared, but CPUs wouldn't be overselled. It's not always clear what providers actually offer, but the price is an indicator

matteocontrini

[deleted] honestly I doubt that. ~$30 a month for 4 vCPU is a cheap price for shared vCPUs, imagine if they were dedicated. Plus they give unlimited traffic, email and what else. They also have a 1 vCPU offer for 1€/2$. There's no way that vCPU is dedicated, that offer wouldn't be sustainable (not with Xeon E5 CPUs for sure).

Also, the website never says that CPUs are dedicated. They write "dedicated SSD" and "dedicated performance". And then they suggest to look at "cloud servers" if looking for a product where "all resources are dedicated". And in fact the pricing for cloud servers are very similar to (actually higher than) the competition.

[deleted]

matteocontrini well, in my contact, the CPU are listed as dedicated. I won't issue my contact here for obvious reasons, but I can assure you they are dedicated. I took this during a sale they had going, and I specifically chose it because of the dedicated resources.

It's never been an issue in terms of speed, throughout, or anything else. It's actually faster than any other host I've used.

matteocontrini

[deleted] I contacted them and they confirmed that their VPS product doesn't offer dedicated physical CPU cores

[deleted]

matteocontrini they don't now, that's correct. What they are telling you is the truth. However, my VPS is a special deal which is why I'm very reluctant to use anything else. I've been an IONOS customer for years - since the days of 1 & 1 and prior. This is how I got a special customised deal.

MartinJD

[deleted] You're not going to have dedicated CPU as that would require no other instances running on the hypervisor. At best you may have a reservation which would guarantee you a set amount of cycles.

[deleted]

MartinJD what makes you think it's a hypervisor ? It's a physical host. I'm the only one on it. I've carved it up into virtual machines which perform various tasks, but I can assure you, it's dedicate to me solely 😁

I used to have a partner agreement with the legacy 1 & 1 brand via a consultancy role I served some time ago now, and that's how I got this machine.

MartinJD

what makes you think it's a hypervisor ? It's a physical host. I'm the only one on it. I've carved it up into virtual machines which perform various tasks, but I can assure you, it's dedicate to me solely 😁

You say you've "carved it up into VMs" - If you're running VMs on a physical host then by definition it must be running a hypervisor.

[deleted]

MartinJD yes, but I'm the only one on it. I can't say it any plainer than that.

Sorry, but I don't see how this conversation can progress any further. I won't respond to any more posts in relation to this thread.

MartinJD

[deleted] Fair enough. Sounds like you got a great deal in any case. All the best with it.

Zeokat

I'm happy with DigitalOcean 5$ droplet, is more than enougth to run a medium size Flarum community.
I think that DigitalOcean website is clear enougth, is quite simple compared with most of providers. But maybe offer many products that you don't need and maybe is what seems confusing to the new user.

The other providers i tested was Vultr and Linode. Both are also good, i can't see that you go wrong choosing any of them.

All of them have port 25 blocked by default, so you have to request to support to open it. If you don't open it, SMTP will not work.

luceos

Zeokat SMTP will not work.

On that port 👍 (25)

MartinJD

Zeokat you sure about that? I'm getting mail outbound from my DO droplet and i havn't asked for any ports top be opened?

Mark73

Zeokat May I know how many members does your community have? I'm planning on going for the $5 plan but I'm still not very sure if that would be enough, I'm clueless about how much disk space is used often.

Zeokat

luceos The default SMTP port 👍️ (25)

Zeokat

MartinJD It depends on the account, is not blocked at Droplet level.

I'm pretty sure about that:
https://www.digitalocean.com/community/questions/port-25-465-is-blocked-how-can-i-enable-it

MartinJD

Zeokat hmm. i dont remember needing to set anything up for my droplet. Come to think of it, i dont remember setting an smtp server. how does default "mail" driver from the GUI work in flarum? how does it know how or where to send email to?

Zeokat

MartinJD If your smtp works correctly, there is nothing wrong, you are lucky guy 👍️ . Maybe you have postfix installed and you didn't noticed that... hard to tell. Thats another topic and i prefer to stick to the discussion.

Zeokat

Mark73 I think that a 5$ DO droplet can handle medium size community, all depends on daily activity, number of extensions running, etc, etc... Take in mind that is not the same a community with 1000 members than a community with 1000 daily active members.

About the hard disk space again all depends if you go to allow userrs to upload resources to the server, the size of the reources, etc...

Anyway, a 5$ Droplet will be more than enougth for a basic Falrum install.

« Previous Page Next Page »